Hello William and welcome back to Amarna Reunion. The opportunity you present
made me think for a few days. But let's deal with your other interests first.

1. "When memory is set up at, identified to, its code regime - that is when
human industry sees and manipulate DNA - then past life memories will focus
(like a compass points to north) over DNA forms."

Two matters come up for me here, first the 'code regime' and then the
relationship of past life memories to DNA.

It takes a lot of work for each one of us to decipher the codes that underlie or
give meaning to our memories. Carolyn Myss has proposed that these cultural
codes are fed or beaten into us during childhood, before we are able to say
'No!' If left unexamined, these codes of meaning become tyrants in our lives
but we never actually know what drives us.

More and more people I know pick our DNA as the source of our past life
memories. Logically that cannot be so, because Many people 'remember' lives
where they have no direct blood relation to who they were. So there must be a
mixing of 'soul' knowledge, a memory of resonance however that is carried and
transmitted from one person to another, filtered through the DNA of the
individual who does the 'remembering.'

2. " This does not mean that I am not interested with reincarnation theory -
for I have been meeting myself events that I re-present (under the name of
Z.Kelper). I understand and reflect them from le sematic (the semantic?) catalog
of modern psychoanalysis, calling that : 'repetition'."

Whether it is only memories that are repeated, or each of our lives are being
repeated as the eastern concept of Karma tries to explain, the ancient Egyptian
Kings already were part of this 'industry' and totally bought into the concept
of 'repeating births' to the point that they included this phrase as an epithet
after their names!

3. "To 'cybernet' is not a usual word, it could even be a neologism. It seems
also that cybernet is already something that has become yet quite commun
through the planet - however the consequences that will appear once the
embryo Internet has absorb the very bio information of its users, will
eventually reach DNA. This is why I would call cybernet something that we
may not be aware of."

I suppose it is progress to marry cyberspace with the internet and call it
'cybernet', as a euphemism for Artificial Intelligence. Although I think I know
what you might mean, I cannot see the way we use the internet at this point as a
cyborg organism. That is not to say that our use of the internet cannot affect
our DNA! I am sure it can, in ways I hate to admit: through the radiation of
the various computer hardware packs; through the constant glare into our eyes;
through focusing for hours a foot or two in front of us, teaching our DNA that
there is nothing important to see any further (negating nature).

4. " My interest in amarna come from the view which assign to that moment and
place a role that can be called "Primal Scene". A Primal Scene is something from
which a code generates. It is not a repetition, it is the zero degree of
repetition.
Of course in a egg many things repeat. But there is one thing there which
is... not event unique, original and first, but which is still zero. DNA is
modified in consequence of a Primal Scene - may be not on the very same
place and time - but it is modified in a way of consequence."

It may be a surprise to many of our List readers/members that Akhenaten created
a 'Primal Scene' at Akhetaten! Many people call that 'Primal Scene' the
creation of monotheism, but although I have consistently argued against
Akhenaten being a monotheist, I cannot deny your assessment of Amarna as a
'Primal Scene'. Monotheism may have been the consequence of what happened at
Amarna, even if there is no actual evidence at Amarna of monotheism. The
evidence, actually, is far worse, and points to tyranny of theocracy.

5. " From 1985 I have been theoretizing the same person under three names at
least : Akhnaton, Moses and Oedipus. Later I realised that history had
extended that perception up to another name : Trismegistus. There are even
several other name which can be recollected, and some of them, as Daniel
says can also indicates other persons."

Whether Hermes Trismegistus was Akhenaten-Moses-Oedipus or the three Amenhoteps,
(Amenhotep III-Amenhotep-Son-of-Hapu-Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten) may be immaterial.
Recent research consistently identifies the late 18th dynasty Amenhoteps as the
key players in Ptolemaic and Roman era historical texts, proving two things:
first that the proscription against Akhenaten had been long forgotten and that
Akhenaten and whatever happened to him were remembered a thousand years later.

6. "Now my activity has turned over French systems, and my age, career and
future plans, do not allow me to take good care of <dnafoundation.com> - for
two, three years or even more, I did not made any change to it. Yet it could be
a good thing to change that state of latency. This is why I put
<dnafoundation.com> on sale - not for money, price can be low - but with the
sole agreement that it will continue to include that archive data. For the
rest, just an index home page could be changed and combined to a whole new set
of data that will be free of agreement.
I offer this deal to Daniel, if he is interested with ; I am also pleased
to say hello to the people of this e-group that I read for several years by
now. I stop here my writing to give place to an enormous bunch of wishes for the
past, and for the future.."

I thank you for both the offer of <dnafoundation.com> and the 'enormous bunch of
wishes!' I would like to hear more details about the website - where it is
located and what are the yearly payments. I would have thought that Fred or Hal
would be far more adept at guiding any future life for this website than I would
be, and would gladly defer the task to either of them. So tell me more, please!

Wishing you the creative energies of this Spring,

Daniel