Thank you for your message. Yes I am okay, quite well. I follow also your progress through FaceBook and listen nice music thanks to you. For the painting and your stamina as well.

   Your last post brings to me thoughts and comments. Perhaps will you enjoy the little history :
   Around 1990-1991 I lived one year in London. On my agenda was to work with Frances Yates' school in order to assure my understanding of the Hermes Trismegistus approach. During this stay I met by chance Ahmed Osman who had published Akh=Moses and was going on with Tut=Jesus.

   I get assured about Ahmed's starting first equation Yuy=Joseph by asking to friends scholar jews their opinion. They applauded. Then they appreciated the second (Akh=Mos) since there was already some time that I was verifying it with them. Later I did my own analysis of the third (Tut=Jesus) which is rather prone to be interpreted as a symptom that takes place once the Oedipus is not added to the Akh=Mos   ( e.g Akh=Mos=Oed ).

   In London I invited Ahmed and we had a conversation. I showed him the Oedipus connection. At the same moment he was invited by some lodge in Amsterdam or so that would let him know informations about european middle-ages and hermeticism somewhat. He said taht he was not aware (see below) but he was puzzled and.. buzy. We said good bye.

   Several year later I was in New York. Meanwhile I could have given a lecture thanks to a New Age association hosted in some basement of the UN and directed by a Ramadas. By extraordinary we discovered later that Ramadas and Ahmed has been friend when they were young men in Cairo and they had lost contact since. Ramadas told me that at this early time Ahmed was frentic with Greek theater ! you'd say haha, I said héhé...  So for the second time I invited Ahmed for a conversation.

   He came to New York. I found him a room at our neighbourg at the penthouses West-End avenue - a number where Gorbatchev came onces, after the Bahaii apostled made the first US headquater. Charles Pope came from Florida to join us. Ahmed arrived and first thing he declared at our meeting that he agreed with the Akh=Oed. It was several years after our first meeting. He never attempted to contact me meanwhile. I was glad yet. However it was understandable that everyone mind his own business and that he did not feel confortable to advocate it - and even less to draw consequences from.

   I don't remember which way round was the first conference : the one I organized myself for the three of us (Charles, Ahmed and me) and the one at the UN again. Mine gave an equal time for each of us to give our contribution. At the UN Ramadas was excited I guess in seeing his friend again - the entire lecture was given to Ahmed. I was at the very end, and at the end of the table. They left me less than three minutes to talk. As I gradualy understood the plot I had time to improvise an origami where if you open the two faces (Akh & Mos) of a same sheet of paper (in order to show over one single face the two Akh and Mos side by side - there must be a trick ; and this sheet of paper necessarily was actually already folded. As if you show on the same plane front and back cover of a book, it necessarily opens the book and shows text inside. Actually it showed Oedipus. I could play the trick on stage in less that one minutes and the rest of my time I could thank Ahmed and Ramadas.

   After this adventure, Ahmed went back to London. Just before, at the NY musem, he told me about Ziho Awass ; Ahmed always willingly talk with me. The only prob is that when he has an opportunity to show off he can walk over anyone - at least over me. I am used to the trick : my father, when he was a young man was swimming with his cousin. In the middle of the lake my father could not swim anymore and began to drawn. His cousin came for help. Last thing my father remember, he told me, was that he was walking over the head of his cousin, pushing him in the depth in expectation he could reach air himself. They were both nearly dead when people with a boat could rescue them and carry them in coma on the bank.. where they could come back to life, otherwise I could never live.. and live the experience again.
   However I can't say that I take Ahmed for my father. My father sometimes invited me ! Ahmed never. So the Oedipus Complex is to be understood there in a larger view.
   David Gittens had been the architect of the first UN lecture. After the second, Charles and David became devotees of Ahmed. Eventually I was broke and I went spending my last immigrant days in Florida by them. David turned angry because I did not complied with my american wife - Charles was unable even to find a job for me in Orlando. I eventually left the USA forever and went to check out if there is anything in Ayahusca where it is native. I found it beautifull and headed back to France with drinking tobacco juce.

   This story is all about the oedipian key. When we think of a key, we always see it as the same which open and close the door. We are so used to it that we don't imagine a key which only locks on. Then the more you turn it in, the more the door is looked. This is the way Akhnaton=Moses goes. Of course it is a key , oh! Ahmed's devotees !  First use of it has been made to put a name over Akhnaton and make him locked in Moses'shoes. Then heroes come and they put the key in again and, as they turn it, it unlocks even more the case in adding sweet Oedipus into the suitcase.
   If you open it now, they will all jump at your face : Hermes, Oedipus, Orpheus, Akhnaton

   It will be opened some day. Will they say : hum ! so all these are Moses..  Moses a won the table/game !

   Hum.. the Unconscious will say so if you leav it alone. Yet once and if it is analysed it is the Oedipus Complex which comes forth. That is something a bit more subtle than making war to gain peace. Don't bother if books go out of the system, the system is not the end.

   When do you come to Frenze ?

Will

   By the way, you know, I have continued the unseen path. With the opener-key I crossed over Bruno (Giordano) and his Artificial Brain ( Art of Memory / wheels , according to Yates ) so I connected history & cybernetics together. And then it opened to the brain code as well as to the cell code - so it applied to biology which can be ruled by Artificial Intelligence - not 'only' by AI.. for humankind will mary it and who knows who is ruling within a couple. Whoever does,  it necessarily leads towards the effective industry of memory through keepings our DNA & biography as a.. wheel (in some sort). Each will of us set up the very end of alchemy even after the end of our said 'life' and continuously until the end of cybernétics. Alchemy is basically done with memory in nature ; this is named Ecology for who knows.. (just a step beyond Darwinism that we can call principe of death).  I created the company and registered the plan for a patent.. that nobody understood, but who cares.. for in order to keep on running this human industrial memory, there is no other conclusion than to drive it as politics. So eventually I could draw the lines of a political party. This is where I can rest in my life. All this complying with Hermeticism I guess.

Will (20090917203200)