AMO de-ci de-là

Texte à SQ / FB.24 mai 2021 23:57

Texte de Charles Pope / 23 mai 2021 19:27

[Ahmed, David and Stan: Click on William's link and then hit the translate tab to read his response in English. It's a good enough translation to get the gist of his message.]

With respect to Trump, the Oedipus aspect is not immediately obvious. But, of course his supermodel wife is a kind of Nefertiti, who he prefers to remain silent in the background (like Moses suppressed Miriam in the Exodus story). It will be interesting to see if Melania eventually "mouths off" about her "sexist, misogynist, pig" husband (lol). Will she also like Ziporrah exclaim, "What a bloody husband you are to me!" What will be her sentence?

Regarding the sexual element of the Oedipus association, this is also evident in Trump's profile. It is even more prominent in his political life. [By the way, Trump himself prefers to identify with the Biblical figure of Samson, who "brought down the house" with his bare hands. The character Samson, who also was made to "turn the wheel," can be viewed as a local version of the sun-king.] Trump is consumed by the incestuous nature of power, and by cloaking himself with royal connections. He has consciously adopted the role/persona/etc. of Moses, and as part of proclaiming to all with "ears to hear" that the ancient power (or whatever it has now morphed into) is still guiding international affairs.

I had not considered Gorbachev as a Russian Moses, but he did consent to "tear down the wall" and he effectively dismantled the Soviet Union. Touché!

In a time of the corona plagues, will a demented Trump be the chosen instrument to dismantle the United States, or will he surprise us all and "make America great again?"

The best case scenario would be that he is being used to flush out all of the bigots and racists (and other cultural lepers) into the open where they can be publicly shamed and neutralized.

Unfortunately, the worst case is about as horrifying as anyone can imagine. There does appear to be a crack in the solidarity of the "old money" people. The hoary precedent is for the "wings of the dragon" to break away from the core of the oppressive regime and form an new alliance/covenant with more high-minded (liberal), scientifically (high-tech) oriented leaders.

In mythological terms, "Judah"/Horus the Elder separates from "Simeon and Levi"/Re and Set, the killers of "Issachar"/Osiris, and allies with "Joseph"/Ptah. This leads to a bitter conflict in which Horus the Elder is also killed and Horus the Younger ("Benjamin"/Greek Hercules) also sacrifices himself. Total victory is, however, not achieved. There is an ugly compromise whereby Set is allowed to retain control over Upper Egypt. "Good" does not completely vanquish "Evil." There is only a détente and with the promise of an increasingly better world in the future.

In today's context, the "brainy/geeky" Joseph band is represented by Microsoft, Google, Tesla/SpaceX, FaceBook, Apple and Amazon/Blue Origin. However, the precedent of Judah creating a kinder, gentler world with Joseph also dictates that such a "betrayal" of the entrenched power must be attacked and punished, i.e., another World War would take place before a more enlightened era can emerge! Fun, fun, fun. This is the type of occult thinking that the elites swear by. Whether they are ready to find another way forward is difficult to say. It seems to me that they are still committed to using the same tired but "time-honored" scripts to create change that they (not we) need.

Of course, I also left out perhaps the most significant Moses figures of history, that of Jesus himself. There is a strong Moses typecasting of Jesus in the New Testament. As an infant he must be hidden in the Egyptian Delta from those that seek to kill him. His mission is to "turn the tables" on corruption and establishment thinking. Ultimately, he is rejected and the Jews pay the heavy price for that rejection. However, he also founds a more "progressive" religion, which lobbies against the harsh treatment of slaves and of women. Alrighty then.

Signed, sealed and delivered, Charles

Texte de Charles Pope / 23 mai 2021 23:51

We don't want to neglect any cultural memories or "repress" them (in the Freudian parlance). I did my best to integrate the Oedipus Cycle of Sophocles with what I could learn from Ahmed and also by reading Velikovsky's books. As far as Hermetic tradition, I have also read what little is publicly available, but have no access to private archives, such as in Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, etc. Much of the Freemason material has, however, been divulged and I haven't seen anything too revolutionary there. I guess you have to become the Grand Master first (and that position is likely reserved).

The most fruitful vein of research has been the study of Cosmology and how ancient Cosmology was preserved in Myth and the Bible. From that perspective, we can now understand the Moses tradition "far and away" better than before. The Cosmic Moses led a Galactic Exodus from the original cradle of civilization of the Milky Way, near the Great Rift where stellar fertility is very high. (The one in East Africa is but an echo!) Intelligent life emerged in that hot, crowded and violent plane/plain of our galaxy, but it could not safely remain there. The Cosmic Moses led his "people" away from cataclysm into the relative stability of the northern reaches of our galaxy. For this, the Cosmic Moses was both revered and reviled, because "draconian" measures were taken to survive and eventually thrive again. The Cosmic Moses assumed the power of life and death over the people and didn't want to let it go!

The Cosmic Moses represents the principle of replacing superstition with science, and not necessarily with any grace. The Cosmic Moses was amoral, even atheistic, and willing to apply situational ethics. Little people could be sacrificed for the "greater good." For that reason, I have reservations about the idea of a "spiritual Oedipus." This almost appears to be an oxymoron. I suppose there can be a kind of spirituality in raw knowledge, but this is about as satisfying as eating communion wafers ("manna") in the wilderness. Spirituality is what we do with the knowledge, or sometimes the lack thereof.

Not everyone fancies the idea that we are merely reconstituted star dust. We don't like to think we can ever be replaced by a machine or even AI. Sadly, most of us can easily be replaced, because we didn't have the opportunity to develop our innate genius or somehow missed it.

Most people don't want to live in a cold, literal, scientific world. We are happier with some level of abstraction. We want to enjoy the forest, not inspect every leaf. We don't always want to stare at the naked truth. Certain things are less distracting when they are covered! Ok, I'm not French!

Most if not all humans make for very bad scientists. We like to exercise our mind, but we also desire the pull of instinct in keeping us grounded and restoring our soul. As hard as scientists may try, they fall into the same traps of irrational behavior and counter-productive orthodoxy as non-scientists. Instead of inviting and embracing new ideas, scientists actively "repress" anything that challenges the status quo.

Even so, we still need to be shocked out of our comfort zone from time to time. Complacency can quickly become an enemy. We learn to love our conventional wisdom and even our superstitions. We settle for dining on leeks and onions lazily along the Nile. But what happens when the life-giving waters turns deadly? How do we escape and take refuge in another land? How do we convince ourselves it's going to get better in time? It takes a strong leader ("dictator") to tell us lies and unite us with a viable escape plan. And, what happens when we no longer need that leader, but that leader still needs us? This is the problem that the world faces now. We don't need leaders that prey upon us and keep us poor and ignorant. We need to return to a "commonwealth" that removes the need for exploitation of humans and the ecology. Unfortunately, the Bible (sponsored by royals and for the benefit of royals) doesn't provide a lot of help on "how to change the system." We may be at the mercy of those in power to lay that power down. Instead, they keep using the Moses meme to manufacture misery. Then, they force us to accept a Savior and New Deal/Covenant of their own creation.

Still, we look to France to help restore our liberty (haha)!

I did find this interesting bio on Patrice Hernu. He's definitely on a mission to recover that "Philadelphia Freedom" and he's not afraid to change horses on the way! https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=https://everybodywiki.com/Patrice_Hernu&prev=search&pto=aue

So, in brief (lol), Moses is a shepherd we sometimes need but never want. The very idea of Moses is one that we are prone to repress. Moses shines a rude light into our doomed darkness. We reform until the storm is over, then we just want the reformers to leave us alone!

Texte de Charles Pope / 24 mai 2021 06:21

Even so, Akhenaten can now be absolved of both slurs. Queen Tiye was the mother of Akhenaten only in the sense of being the Great Queen. (In the Bible, Moses is adopted by a woman of the Egyptian court, but she is probably not also his actual mother. "Moses son of Imran" is himself also a product of incest.) Akhenaten and Tiye may have had a daughter together, but judging in accordance with the literal standard of a Moses figure, it was not strictly speaking a mother-son incest. Likewise, Akhenaten may have been complicit in the death of Yuya (Greek Laius), but, again, Yuya was not his literal father. Amenhotep III was his literal father. The Bible simply states that Moses killed an Egyptian taskmaster, which is an echo of the tradition of Osiris being killed by a conspiracy condoned if not directed by Ra.

That is not to say Akhenaten was a well-adjusted individual and not guilty of some rather dastardly deeds (such as working children to death in building Amarna). Yet, we cannot always be sure what was real and what was staged, because Akhenaten was following a script. Generally, royal persons were not put to death for any reason, but there are signs that during the Amarna Period things got personal. For example, it’s not clear whether the mouth of Nefertiti (“The Younger Lady” mummy) was bashed in before or after her death. (As it turns out, there are no major missing mummies from the Amarna court, including Akhenaten who was mislabeled as Amenhotep III and Amenhotep III who was mislabeled as Ramses I). There was an attempt to deny Smenkhkare a royal burial, but again was this because he was not faithful in playing his own designated part, or because his role included a begrudged burial? Further research may eventually tease such verdicts out, but for now, we can at least know what role Smenkhkare was required to fulfill. Biblical Moses had two “sons,” Eliezer and Gershom. As it turns out, neither Smenkhkare nor Tut were biological sons of Akhenaten. They were attached to Akhenaten as sons to round out the typecasting.

Getting back to Donald Trump, he is definitely a Tyrannasaurus Rex. His continued leadership has been foisted upon the Republican Party. They are obliged to help him complete his role, which will probably earn him the “damnae memoria” applied to Akhenaten, but the perpetual gratitude of elitist society. The Media pounded home the message that Trump was dividing the nation. That wasn’t really the case, but it was part of the necessary profile. The glorious empire of Amenhotep III (“Solomon”) was divided and nearly lost by Akhenaten (“Moses”). Similarly, the reputation of Hitler is forever damned, but that doesn’t prevent him from being the subject of a TV documentary almost every night. Still, you would think that Hitler would have been the Moses to end all Moseses. Why even bring that kind of smoke again!

And, now, dear William, what can be done about your own intense association with Akhenaten? The identification is so complete that you find yourself inviting the same repression he did. We are your friends and we try to understand. We have listened to your calls and have accepted them. You have made a lasting contribution. As a physician, you must now heal thyself. You must somehow “purge the fixation” on Akhenaten and not lash out against those you think are rejecting you. Surely, our collective research has allowed all of us to see Akhenaten for what he was. He is not a worthy idol or a potential cure for our planet. At best, he is an object lesson. As it’s been said, no one is completely worthless, they can always serve as a bad example. Akhenaten was trapped in a bad play (aren't we all?) and gave a rather lackluster performance. There were much more impressive Moses figures, both before and after him. When will the madness ever end?

Texte de Charles Pope / 25 mai 2021 00:16 ?

Je ne suis pas tout à fait prêt à lire dans les pensées d'Akhenaton lorsqu'il s'agit de coucher avec sa famille. Mais, je reconnais la nécessité de poser les questions délicates et de plonger dans les aspects subconscients de la sexualité humaine, à la fois royale et autre. Je peux dire que les membres de la famille royale ont utilisé un certain nombre d'astuces pour rendre la pratique de l'inceste plus acceptable. Par exemple, les dames ont souvent pris l'apparence d'actrices ou même de prostituées (comme Tamar et Judah; et la plus tard "call girl" Volumnia Cytheris, alias Cléopâtre, et son "souteneur" Jules César.) Ils ont également fait semblant de rendre visite à leurs frères. comme des chiennes royales plus respectables mais "exotiques" (comme la reine de Saba jouant la prostituée avec Salomon). Cependant, je ne peux pas prétendre vous dire si cela les a vraiment aidés dans leur «suspension de l'incrédulité».

Quand je suis descendu pour la première fois dans le terrier d'Akhenaton, j'étais content de l'excitation de voir des personnages bibliques associés de manière convaincante à des personnes historiques / archéologiques. Il a fallu longtemps, très longtemps avant que je me sente comme si je commençais à discerner ce que les personnes royales pensaient et ressentaient réellement à propos de leur «malédiction de la royauté». (Dans la tradition sacerdotale, ils préféraient être considérés comme des bergers pauvres, persécutés et pitoyables essayant simplement de trouver des pâturages pour leurs troupeaux. Dans la tradition des Rois / Chroniques, la contrainte de soumettre la Terre couvrait une multitude de péchés.) la mentalité royale est encore une entreprise spéculative, et ce n'est pas celle qui sera reprise par les universitaires de si tôt. Ils sont toujours guidés par un tabou enraciné dans le mythe séculaire selon lequel les membres de la famille royale sont spéciaux et différents des autres et, par conséquent, vous ne vous aventurez pas dans leur entreprise. De plus, les universitaires, comme ceux qui s'associent à Patrice Hernu, ne veulent tout simplement pas invoquer le mépris de leurs pairs en s'associant à quelque chose de lointain étrange ou potentiellement embarrassant.

Nous sommes si peu nombreux à avoir essayé d'aller au-delà d'une connaissance superficielle de la période amarnienne en particulier (et de la culture royale en général) qu'il est inutile pour nous de nous éloigner les uns des autres. S'il vous plaît, ne soyez pas offensé lorsque nous n'évoquons pas Œdipe à chaque fois que nous discutons d'Akhénaton. Je me rends compte à quel point cela a été une lutte pour obtenir un soutien pour le modèle Akhenaton-Moïse-Œdipe ("AMO"). Et maintenant qu'il y a au moins une certaine acceptation, je dois vous dire que ce n'est pas très précis. Dans la Torah, l'histoire de Moïse est racontée comme un composite d'au moins deux événements de l'Exode et des personnages de Moïse. Par conséquent, Moïse n'est pas précisément Akhenaton. D'un autre côté, dans le récit de Kings / Chronicles, Akhenaton n'est pas un personnage hybride mais appelé Roboam, le successeur intelligent de Salomon qui a bêtement divisé le royaume idéal. Donc, nous devrions vraiment modifier AMO en ARO ou ARMO, c'est-à-dire Akhenaton-Rehoboam-Moses-Oedipus. Cela distingue Akhenaton en tant que Roboam-Moïse de Khufu-Moïse (Sabtah / Tiras), Sargon-Moïse (Arphaxad / Adam II), Hammurabi-Moïse (Eber / Shammai) et Tao-Moïse (Jessé / Terah). Désolé pour ça! Peut-être qu'Hermès-Trismégiste a besoin de se joindre à ce groupe en tant que HARMO, me dites-vous.

Le domaine de la psychologie a tellement changé depuis que je suis à l'école qu'il n'est même pas reconnaissable. Le cerveau n'est plus une «boîte noire» et les psychologues ne déduisent plus son fonctionnement interne du seul comportement extérieur. Les scientifiques vont dans la tête et mesurent ce qui s'y passe. Pour utiliser une analogie grecque, nous ne sommes plus dans le monde d'Aristote où les problèmes sont résolus simplement par de brillants penseurs, mais en mesurant des choses dans le monde réel, comme les déséquilibres chimiques / hormonaux et d'autres choses produites par les glandes à l'intérieur du cerveau. Ironiquement, cela s'appelle maintenant «psychologie cognitive». Ok, la science (telle qu'elle existe sur Terre) en est à ses balbutiements. Donc, je suis heureux de voir que les astrophysiciens font preuve de beaucoup plus d'humilité récemment, sinon les neuroscientifiques (haha).

Il est également surprenant que les scientifiques ne pensent plus que l'inceste avec modération est problématique. L'inceste tel que pratiqué par la famille royale était à un autre niveau et non durable. Mais, qui va analyser cela? Et, qui va analyser le cas extrême de la psychologie royale par opposition à la psychologie individuelle ou collective / de masse? Nous ne pouvons pas dire que la famille royale ne savait rien de l'élevage. L'histoire de Jacob usurpant le troupeau de Laban indique qu'ils étaient fiers de leurs prouesses d'élevage (ainsi que de voler d'autres choses). Pourtant, l'impulsion de thésauriser semble les avoir empêchés d'appliquer les meilleurs principes de sélection à eux-mêmes. À maintes reprises, ils se sont délibérément enfermés dans un coin génétique.

Cette «strangulation génétique» a dû être pensée pour faire ressortir tout leur potentiel de génie. Et qui a été leur meilleur exemple pour cette forme clinique et inhumaine de consanguinité extrême? Ce n'était nul autre que l'archétype de Moïse, le dieu soleil du «savant fou» Ra (patriarche Irad). Bien sûr, une autre divinité, Ptah, le vénéré patriarche Enoch (et l'archétype Joseph), était également un fanatique de la reproduction! Pourtant, Ptah semble avoir eu un cœur (c'est-à-dire un mammifère plutôt qu'un reptilien). Il était le premier (peut-être le seul) dieu à entendre et à répondre aux prières humaines du cœur. Ses fidèles ont même apporté des modèles d'oreilles à son temple comme offrandes. Les cultes du soleil étaient plus préoccupés d'arracher les cœurs des victimes sacrificielles et, dans le cas de Moïse, d'aveugler les yeux de ceux qui le suppliaient de leurs souffrances.

à venir